|
"Martin, the problem with Rogue
ADA lawsuits is that regardless of their merit or how frivolous they
appear, once they've been filed, you're stuck."
CLINT EASTWOOD
"Martin, as we enter the new millennium, there are other factors at
play, factors with no historical precedent."
PRESIDENT JIMMY CARTER
"I want to thank Martin for his commitment to improving long-term
care and to educating the public about the great need for affordable
quality care in this country."
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON
"Martin, I know first-hand about the problems families face in
trying to provide for long-term care needs. My father lived with my
family for many years. We were fortunate enough to be able to keep
him with us in our home."
DENNIS HASTERT
Speaker of the House
"Martin, you’ve made me cry. You’ve made me smile. You’ve angered
me. In short, you’ve gotten me involved. Your words vibrate like
none others who wrote about these issues, and I know it’s because
you’re walking the walk. To say you inspire me in like a whisper in
a gale."
MARTIN SABEL
The Sabel Company, Houston, TX

It was a rainy, Friday
afternoon in 1995. The neurologist at Albany Medical College
completed his diagnostic workup, then reviewed the EEGs, EMGs, CAT
scans, MRIs and lumbar puncture records from previous neuro
consults. He was the best movement disorder man within a
200-mile radius and I had waited six months for the appointment.
"You have Parkinson's
Disease," he said, and I remember thinking how badly I wanted a cup
of coffee.
He wrote a prescription for Sinemet and I went in search of a Dunkin
Donuts.
I was not in the mood for a melancholy Martin Bayne retrospective
that day, nor was I compelled to understand the
neuropsychopharmacology of the sample bottle of levodopa in my
jacket pocket. I just needed the companionship of a ‘large, light
and sweet – regular’ coffee and a good cinnamon bun.
That was twelve years ago. I was 45 years old and still on my
Parkinson’s honeymoon. The concept of disability was a verb I always
conjugated in the future tense. I was relatively free of symptoms
and enjoying what would turn out to be the last period of my life in
which I would describe myself in ‘good health.’ The honeymoon was
about to end.
The
Alpha-Omega Continuum
We arrive as infants “trailing clouds of glory” from the farthest
corners of the cosmos.
Ambassadors of the infinite, we emerge from the life support capsule
that had been home for the nine month journey and gulp our first
lungfuls of air. Our brains, a complex and massive set of discrete,
parallel processing units, are already analyzing and storing data,
and most of the body’s organ systems are in full power-up mode.
During the first few months following our arrival – stage Alpha – we
are in our most vulnerable configuration: we are unable to defend
ourselves; feed, dress or clean ourselves. In fact, our very
existence depends entirely on the assistance, nurturing and good
will of others, many of them complete strangers.
Deoxyribonucleic acid to the rescue. There are social
anthropologists that will argue to the contrary, but I am convinced
that homo sapiens are programmed biologically to care for, protect
and nurture their very young. Notice I said very young. That’s
because this particular DNA imperative seems to be time dependent –
the older a child gets, the less compelling the imperative. And
herein lies the rub. If we, as a once very young child survive
adulthood and middle age, then there is strong likelihood we will
move towards the Omega portion of the birth-to-death continuum.
Here, we prepare to end our journey exactly as we arrived: often
unable to perform the normal activities of daily living, and
dependent on the care and nurturing of others. But the imperative to
care for a 93 year old child shifts from a purely biological one to
a social, moral and spiritual one, as that “child’s” caregivers have
hence passed on. Rather, it becomes the children now who must decide
whether they will honor a covenant made in utero: an unspoken
promise to protect and nurture those who gave us the opportunity to
experience the greatest miracle of all – life.
The Journey
Begins
Well, here we are, twelve years and many donuts later. In
neurological terms, most of the dopaminergic cells that I once
counted on for relatively normal muscular coordination have
perished. If, like me, you are in this stage of Parkinson’s, you
become dependent on the pharmacological regimen that seems to
dominate every waking moment of your life; dependent on your team of
physicians; dependent on the kindness of those who will buy your
groceries, cook your food and clean your house.
Until quite recently, dependency was a concept with which I was
unfamiliar, although I’ve now slowly begun to accept my loss of
independence and the assistance of others. Conceptually, it is still
awkward to acknowledge that I am now “disabled;” there is simply an
awareness that my life has irrevocably changed, and in the course of
this change, the reality of ADL (Activities of Daily Living)
failure. Tying my shoes and taking a shower have suddenly become
effortful – some days impossible.
A few years ago, my doctors stated unambiguously that it was “no
longer in my best interest” to continue to live alone. It took a few
days for the imperative to sink in, and when it did, I distinctly
remember a profound sense of confusion and despair. It was at this
moment that I was forced to accept the reality of my disability. But
what frightened me even more was the knowledge that I had absolutely
no idea what not living alone would look like; I had no idea where
to turn, or what to do. Ironically, as a well –known health care
advocate and prolific publisher and author of issues related to
long-term care, I was startled to realize that I was unfamiliar with
even the most rudimentary knowledge necessary in order to proceed
upon my doctor’s advice.
To borrow a metaphor I often use, I felt like I was being sucked
into a piece of farm machinery – I could grossly envision the
inevitable outcome, but felt powerless to change it. At the center
of this personal challenge, in the eye of the hurricane, years of
advocacy began to crystallize like long, thin strands of DNA into a
tangible purpose. From that core purpose came a passion and a sense
of determination that emboldened me with a mission – a clear
understanding of the primordial covenant we have with our elders,
particularly those who are frail and ill, and the need to reaffirm
that sacred covenant against the backdrop of a new century of human
history.
man·i·fes·to: a written statement
declaring publicly the intentions, motives, or views of its issuer.
Arthur Schopenhauer, perhaps the most influential philosopher of the
nineteenth century, described the three stages in the recognition of
any truth: first, it is ridiculed; next, it is resisted; and
finally, it is considered self-evident
The foundation of this manifesto rests on a bedrock of one simple
truth: that our long-term care delivery system is on the brink of
collapse, and most Americans are either unaware of or indifferent to
this reality.
For decades, most of us have lived in denial regarding the physical,
emotional and financial trauma, which often characterizes LTC. We
refuse to talk openly about the possibility of someday needing
protracted medical care. Instead, we say, “I’ll never have a stroke
or develop Alzheimer’s Disease. Even if I do, the Veterans or
Medicare or my Elk’s Lodge or children will take care of me.” “After
all,” we reason, “I’m sure that after working and paying taxes for
40 years, I’m at least entitled to some kind of care.”
Tragically, the ultimate consequence of that denial is often both
traumatic and unnecessary – to the individual, their spouse and
family, and their community. The nation’s long-term health care
delivery system is in crisis — collapsing under the weight of public
indifference, a lack of political leadership, and a significant
institutional bias created by thirty-four years of government
payment systems, which have created a dramatic fissure disconnecting
the basic and fundamental, economic relationship between cost and
quality.
Living with Parkinson’s Disease for five years has led me to realize
that the quality of my life — as well as the quality of life of the
millions of similarly situated, chronically ill, disabled, frail and
elderly individuals also suffering ADL failure — depends on the
future viability of our LTC system. To secure that viability and
effect genuine LTC reform, we need to address three, essential
areas:
Education:
We need individually and collectively to
understand the nature and scope of the problem.
Choice:
We need to acknowledge our options. The
current institutional bias, coupled with the conflict arising out of
the Medical Intervention model vs. the Quality of Life model, have
failed us miserably. There are alternatives.
Financing:
We need to create a viable method of financing LTC that involves
both public and private sector support as well as the individual
acknowledgement of equality and personal responsibility. In short,
we must all be held accountable.
Genuine LTC reform will not come easily. There is a great deal of
money and political power at stake. Nevertheless, to ensure our very
survival, We the People must begin to dictate the terms of that
reform, and We the People will determine what is in our own best
interest.
This mission is not for the faint of heart, but we must lead the
crusade for genuine reform as if our lives depend on it — because
they do.
Martin K. Bayne |